We added two new federal cases to our Oversight Case Law Tracker, expanding this free resource for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers interested in congressional and legislative oversight.
Neguse v. ICE (2025) — Twelve Members of Congress filed suit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement over a policy requiring seven days’ advance notice before lawmakers can visit immigration detention facilities. The plaintiffs argue that the policy violates a federal appropriations law guaranteeing Members the right to access such facilities without prior notice. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, is currently awaiting a ruling.
United States v. McIver (2024) — This case examines whether a congressional staff member can be compelled to testify about internal committee deliberations during a criminal trial. The court’s decision reaffirms key protections under the Speech or Debate Clause, reinforcing Congress’s constitutional independence in carrying out its legislative functions.
The Oversight Case Law Tracker gathers judicial decisions that shape the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch, helping users understand how oversight authority is interpreted and enforced in the courts.
Explore the new cases or the full collection of case law through the buttons below!